Optimal Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays for Microgrids Using ‎Hybrid Interval Linear Programming - Differential Evolution

Document Type : Research paper

Authors

1 ‎Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Sharekord, Sharekord, Iran

2 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Sharekord, Sharekord, Iran

3 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The relay coordination problem of directional overcurrent has  been an  active research issue in distribution networks and power transmission. In general, the problem of relay coordination is the nonlinearity of the optimization problem, which increases or decreases with different network structures. This paper presents a new method with directional overcurrent relay coordination approach to reduce the operating time of the relays between the primary and backup relays by using hybrid  programming  of  ILP  (interval  linear  programming)  and  DE (differential  evolution).  Due to the difference in short circuit current level from grid connected to the isolated mode, therefore, it is necessary to use a reliable protection solution to reduce this discrimination time and also to prevent the increase of coordination time interval (CTI). The ability of the objective function used in this paper is to reduce the discrimination time of primary and backup relays and simultaneously reduce the operating time of primary and backup relays by introducing a new method. The basic parameters of the directional  overcurrent  relay  (DOCR)  such  as  time  multiplier  setting  (TMS)  and  plug  setting  (PS)  have been adjusted  such  that  the relays  operation  time  should  be  optimized.  Optimization  is  based  on  a  new objective function,  described  as  a  highly  constrained  non-linear  problem  to  simultaneously  minimize  operating  time  in backup  and  primary  relays.  A  function  of  penalty  is  also  used  to  check  the  problem  constraints  in  case  the backup relay time is  fewer  than  that of  the main relay. The method is implemented on modified IEEE 14- and 30-bus distribution networks. The results demonstrate the efficiency of the method, and the values are optimal compared to those of other algorithms. MATLAB program has also been used to simulate optimization.

Keywords


  1. Einaddin, A. Yazdankhah, and R. Kazemzadeh, “Power management in a utility connected micro-grid with multiple renewable energy sources”, J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 5, pp. 1-10, 2017.
  2. Dadfar and M. Gandomkar, “Augmenting protection coordination index in interconnected distribution electrical grids: Optimal dual characteristic using numerical relays”, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 131, p. 107107, 2021.
  3. Akdag and C. Yeroglu, “Optimal directional overcurrent relay coordination using MRFO algorithm: a case study of adaptive protection of the distribution network of the Hatay province of Turkey”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 192, p. 106998, 2021.
  4. Kaper and N. Choudhary, “A review of power management and stability issues in microgrid”, IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron. Intell. Control Energy Syst. 2016.
  5. Laaksonen, “Protection principles for future microgrids”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 25, pp. 2910-18, 2010.
  6. Zavareh et al., “Adaptive sliding mode control of multi-DG, multi-bus grid-connected microgrid”, J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 7, pp. 65-77, 2019.
  7. Sharaf, H. Zeineldin, and E. El-Saadany, “Protection coordination for microgrids with grid-connected and islanded capabilities using communication assisted dual setting directional overcurrent relays”, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, pp. 143-51, 2016.
  8. Padayattil et al., “Hybrid ring microgrid with coordinated energy management scheme”, Proc. Tech., vol. 25, pp. 793-800, 2016.
  9. Alam, “Adaptive protection coordination scheme using numerical directional overcurrent relays”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 15, pp. 64-73, 2018.
  10. Banerjee, R. Narayanasamy, and O. Swathika, “Optimal coordination of overcurrent relays using two phase simplex method and particle swarm optimization algorithm”, Int. Conf. Power Embedded Drive Control, 2017
  11. Bedekar, S. Bhide, and V. Kale, “Optimum coordination of overcurrent relay timing using simplex method”, Electr. Power Comp. Syst., vol. 38, pp. 1175-93, 2010.
  12. Gholinezhad, K. Mazlumi, and P. Farhang, “Overcurrent relay coordination using MINLP technique”, 19th Iran. Conf. Electr. Eng., IEEE, 2011.
  13. Sarwagya, P. Nayak and S. Ranjan, “Optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays in complex distribution networks using sine cosine algorithm”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 187, p. 106435, 2020.
  14. Thangaraj, M. Pant, and K. Deep, “Optimal coordination of over-current relays using modified differential evolution algorithms”, Eng. Appl. Artificial Intell., vol. 23, pp. 820-9, 2010.
  15. Moirangthem et al., “Adaptive differential evolution algorithm for solving non-linear coordination problem of directional overcurrent relays”, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 7, pp. 329-36, 2013.
  16. Damchi et al., “MILP approach for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays in interconnected power systems”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 158, pp. 267-74, 2018.
  17. Bedekar and S. Bhide, “Optimum coordination of overcurrent relay timing using continuous genetic algorithm”, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, pp. 11286-92, 2011.
  18. Zeineldin, E. El-Saadany, and M. Salama, “Optimal coordination of overcurrent relays using a modified particle swarm optimization”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 76, pp. 988-95, 2006.
  19. Wadood et al., “Application of a continuous particle swarm optimization (CPSO) for the optimal coordination of overcurrent relays considering a penalty method”, Energies, vol. 11, p. 869, 2018.
  20. Tjahjono et al., “Adaptive modified firefly algorithm for optimal coordination of overcurrent relays”, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 11, pp. 2575-85, 2017.
  21. Chawla et al., “Gravitational search based algorithm for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays using user defined characteristic”, Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 46, pp. 43-55, 2018.
  22. Srivastava et al., “Optimal coordination of overcurrent relays using gravitational search algorithm with DG penetration”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 54, pp. 1155-65, 2017.
  23. Shih, C. Salazar, and A. Enríquez, “Adaptive directional overcurrent relay coordination using ant colony optimisation”, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 9, pp. 2040-9, 2015.
  24. Hong et al., “User-defined dual setting directional overcurrent relays with hybrid time current-voltage characteristics-based protection coordination for active distribution network”, IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 62752-69, 2021.
  25. Rajput and K. Pandya, “A hybrid improved harmony search algorithm-nonlinear programming approach for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays including characteristic selection”, Int. J. Power Energy Conv., vol. 9, pp. 228-53, 2018.
  26. Srinivas and K. Swarup, “Optimal relay coordination for microgrids using hybrid modified particle swarm optimization-Interval linear programming approach”, North American Power Symp., IEEE, 2017.
  27. Srinivas and K. Swarup, “A hybrid GA-Interval linear programming implementation for microgrid relay coordination considering different fault locations”, 7th Int. Conf. Power Syst., IEEE, 2017.
  28. Trivedi et al., “A novel hybrid PSO-DA algorithm for global numerical optimization”, Net. Commun. Data Knowledge Eng., 2018.
  29. Sarkar and S. Kudkelwar, “Optimal over current relay coordination in Microgrid using a novel hybrid Water Cycle-Moth Flame algorithm”, Int. J. Syst. Assurance Eng. Manage., vol. 12, pp. 553-64, 2021.
  30. ElSayed and E. Elattar, “Hybrid harris hawks optimization with sequential quadratic programming for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays incorporating distributed generation”, Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 60, pp. 2421-33, 2021.
  31. Kida, A. Rivas, and L. Gallego, “An improved simulated annealing-linear programming hybrid algorithm applied to the optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 181, p. 106197, 2020.
  32. Noghabi, H. Mashhadi, and J. Sadeh, “Optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays considering different network topologies using interval linear programming”, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, pp. 1348-54, 2010.
  33. Allahdadi and H. Nehi, “The optimal solution set of the interval linear programming problems”, Optimiz. Letters, vol. 7, pp. 1893-1911, 2013.
  34. Das and P. Suganthan, “Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art”, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 15, pp. 4-31, 2010.
  35. Chattopadhyay, M. Sachdev, and T. Sidhu, “An on-line relay coordination algorithm for adaptive protection using linear programming technique”, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 11, pp. 165-73, 1996.
  36. Benabid et al., “Optimal coordination of IDMT directional overcurrent relays in the presence of series compensation using differential evolution algorithm”, 3rd Int. Conf. Syst. Control, 2013.
  37. Moravej, F. Adelnia, and F. Abbasi, “Optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays using NSGA-II”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 119, pp. 228-36, 2015.
  38. Bedekar and S. Bhide, “Overcurrent relay coordination using the hybrid GA-NLP approach”, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, pp. 109-19, 2011.
  39. Univ, Washington, power system test case archive, Seattle, WA. mar.2006 [online].
  40. Rajput and K. Pandya, “A novel approach for optimum coordination of directional overcurrent relays including far-end faults in interconnected power systems”, Int. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 8, pp. 2481-93, 2016.
  41. Mohammadi et al., “Overcurrent relays coordination considering the priority of constraints”, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, pp. 1927-38, 2011.
  42. Alam, B. Das, and V. Pant, “A comparative study of metaheuristic optimization approaches for directional overcurrent relays coordination”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 128, pp. 39-52, 2015.