Design and Analysis of BLDC Motor with Novel Hybrid Approach for Cogging Torque Reduction

Document Type : Research paper

Authors

Department of Electrical, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Abstract

Radial flux brushless DC motors with surface-mounted permanent magnets offer several advantages, but they are also characterized by a significant drawback: high cogging torque. Mitigating cogging torque is a critical challenge in the design of brushless direct current motors, particularly in applications such as electric vehicles. This article presents three approaches to reduce cogging torque in radial flux permanent magnet brushless motors: teeth edge inset width variation, magnet tip depth variation, and a hybrid approach combining both techniques. The teeth edge inset width variation method involves reducing the inset width of the stator teeth, while the magnet tip depth variation approach addresses the depth of the magnet's edge inset on the rotor core surface. The hybrid approach integrates changes to both the stator teeth and rotor magnet poles. Additionally, the study investigates how these approaches affect the average torque and flux density distribution. Finite element analysis was conducted to simulate and analyze a 1000 W, 510 rpm radial flux brushless DC motor. The results show that the proposed methods effectively reduce cogging torque, demonstrating their potential to enhance the performance of these motors in practical applications.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Y.-P. Yang and D. S. Chuang, “Optimal design and control of a wheel motor for electric passenger cars,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2007.
  2. H. B. Duc, D. B. Minh, and V. D. Quoc, “Modeling of centrifugal stress and deformation of double v and delta layer of interior permanent magnet rotor design-application to electrical vehicles,” GMSARN Int. J., vol. 17, pp. 302–308, 2023.
  3. A. Cavagnino, M. Lazzari, F. Profumo, and A. Tenconi, “A comparison between the axial flux and the radial flux structures for pm synchronous motors,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1517–1524, 2002.
  4. S. Arand, “Optimization of pm segments shift angles for minimizing the cogging torque of yasa-afpm machines using response surface methodology,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 203–212, 2021.
  5. T. Jhankal and A. N. Patel, “Design and cogging torque reduction of radial flux brushless dc motors with varied permanent magnet pole shapes for electric vehicle application,” Trans. Energy Syst. Eng. Appl., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2023.
  6. N. Rostami, A. A. Kadhim, and M. B. Bannae-Sharifian, “Cogging force reduction in pmlsms using segmented magnets,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 206–211, 2025.
  7. R. Bansal, S. Marwaha, and C. Verma, “Cogging torque minimization of pmbldc motor for application in battery electric vehicle,” J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1733–1743, 2023.
  8. L. Dosiek and P. Pillay, “Cogging torque reduction in permanent magnet machines,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1565–1571, 2007.
  9. N. Bianchi and S. Bolognani, “Design techniques for reducing the cogging torque in surface-mounted pm motors,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1259–1265, 2002.
  10. P. T. Luu, J.-Y. Lee, W. Hwang, and B.-C. Woo, “Cogging torque reduction technique by considering step-skew rotor in permanent magnet synchronous motor,” in 2018 21st Int. Conf. Electr. Mach. Syst., pp. 219–223, IEEE, 2018.
  11. T. Anuja and M. A. N. Doss, “Reduction of cogging torque in surface mounted permanent magnet brushless dc motor by adapting rotor magnetic displacement,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 2861, 2021.
  12. Y.-H. Jung, M.-S. Lim, M.-H. Yoon, J.-S. Jeong, and J.-P. Hong, “Torque ripple reduction of ipmsm applying asymmetric rotor shape under certain load condition,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 333–340, 2017.
  13. J. Liang, A. Parsapour, Z. Yang, C. Caicedo-Narvaez, M. Moallem, and B. Fahimi, “Optimization of air-gap profile in interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors for torque ripple mitigation,” IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 118–125, 2019.
  14. C. Bharatiraja, M. Deepak, and D. Jagadeesh, “Finite element analysis of permanent magnet less motors for electric vehicle application,” in 2023 Fifth Int. Conf. Electr. Comput. Commun. Technol., pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2023.
  15. Z. Ding, X. Wu, C. Chen, and X. Yuan, “Magnetic field analysis of surface-mounted permanent magnet motors based on an improved conformal mapping method,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 1689–1698, 2022.
  16. N. Rostami, A. A. Kadhim, and M. B. Bannae-Sharifian, “Cogging force reduction in pmlsms using segmented magnets,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 206–211, 2025.
  17. V. Naeini and N. Sadeghi, “Optimum design of the outer rotor brushless dc permanent magnet motor with minimum torque ripples,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., 2024.
  18. P. R. Upadhyay and K. Rajagopal, “Fe analysis and computeraided design of a sandwiched axial-flux permanent magnet brushless dc motor,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 3401–3403, 2006.
  19. B. Singh and D. Goyal, “Computer aided design of permanent magnet brushless dc motor for hybrid electric vehicle application,” in 2006 Int. Conf. Power Electron. Drives Energy Syst., pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2006.
  20. S. H. Bibak, M. H. Mousavi, and M. Geravandi, “Design and electromagnetic analysis of brushless salient pole switching flux synchronous generator with dc auxiliary field winding for wind energy converter systems,” in 2023 31st Int. Conf. Electr. Eng., pp. 160–166, IEEE, 2023.
  21. D. C. Hanselman, Brushless permanent magnet motor design. The Writers’ Collective, 2003.
  22. J. R. Hendershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of brushless permanent-magnet motors. Oxford university press, 1995.
  23. T. Jhankal and A. N. Patel, “Design and analysis of spoke type radial flux interior permanent magnet synchronous motor for high-speed application,” in 2022 2nd Odisha Int. Conf. Electr. Power Eng. Commun. Comput. Technol., pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2022.
  24. T. Jhankal and A. N. Patel, “Design and cogging torque reduction of radial flux brushless dc motors with varied permanent magnet pole shapes for electric vehicle application,” Trans. Energy Syst. Eng. Appl., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2023.
  25. C. Studer, A. Keyhani, T. Sebastian, and S. Murthy, “Study of cogging torque in permanent magnet machines,” in IAS’97. Conf. Record 1997 IEEE Ind. Appl. Conf. Thirty-Second IAS Annu. Meet., vol. 1, pp. 42–49, IEEE, 1997.

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 26 April 2025
  • Receive Date: 09 July 2024
  • Revise Date: 05 December 2024
  • Accept Date: 07 December 2024
  • First Publish Date: 26 April 2025